<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Indiana Social Security Disability Attorney &#187; Claimant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://disabilitytse.com/tag/claimant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://disabilitytse.com</link>
	<description>Tom S. Ebbinghouse, Attorney At Law, Social Security Disability Indianapolis, Indiana</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:04:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Processing Time for Indianapolis Social Security Disability Hearings Falls Again!</title>
		<link>http://disabilitytse.com/116/processing-time-for-indianapolis-social-security-disability-hearings-falls-again/</link>
		<comments>http://disabilitytse.com/116/processing-time-for-indianapolis-social-security-disability-hearings-falls-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 17:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjudication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benefit From]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claimant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability Claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability Hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evansville Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ft Wayne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ft Wayne Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heariings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indianapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indianapolis Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Disability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilitytse.com/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The processing time for Indianapolis Social Security Disability Hearings at the Office of Adjudication and Review (ODAR) has fallen again. As reported elsewhere on this site, in November 2009, the number of days from the filing of a Request for Hearing until the case was completed at the hearing site averaged 579 days. In April [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The processing time for Indianapolis Social Security Disability Hearings at the Office of Adjudication and Review (ODAR) has fallen again. As reported elsewhere on this site, in November 2009, the number of days from the filing of a Request for Hearing until the case was completed at the hearing site averaged 579 days. In April of 2009, it was 738 days and in June of 2008 it was 896 days. As of March 26, 2010, the number of days from the Request for Hearing for average processing at the Indianapolis ODAR was <strong>534 days</strong>. The Indianapolis office now ranks 130 out of 144 hearing offices. Processing time for Evansville Indiana (rank 86) is now at 460 days and Ft. Wayne Indiana (ranked 115) is at 509 days.</p>
<p>If you check in the archives of this site  for the other postings for processing time, you will be able to see the other rankings for past times. Indianapolis has improved so that it no longer hovers in last or next to last place, and it has not for many months now. Be sure you check out the Archives for postings on many different issues connected to a Social Security Disability claim or you are not getting the full benefit from this site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://disabilitytse.com/116/processing-time-for-indianapolis-social-security-disability-hearings-falls-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Security Disability and Computer Usage</title>
		<link>http://disabilitytse.com/90/social-security-disability-and-computer-usage/</link>
		<comments>http://disabilitytse.com/90/social-security-disability-and-computer-usage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Disability Benefits Denial Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claimant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claimants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Skills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Day Job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indianapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Adage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speculation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilitytse.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are rumors that an administrative law judge stated in a seminar that he went on line and researched to see if the claimant had job applications pending during the claim. The speculation is that the ALJ is using on-line research skills to see if current resumes are being posted by the claimants. Why would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are rumors that an administrative law judge stated in a seminar that he went on line and researched to see if the claimant had job applications pending during the claim. The speculation is that the ALJ is using on-line research skills to see if current resumes are being posted by the claimants. Why would this be important to the ALJ?</p>
<p>When you apply for Social Security Disability, you are stating that you cannot do an 8 hour a day job 5 days a week. If you have posted your resume seeking work, some might conclude that you really think you can work. The old adage “you cannot have your cake and eat it too” comes to mind. Some will conclude that you really are not disabled and you are only using the Social Security Disability system to provide you a means of support while you are looking for work. After all, if you cannot work, why would you be posting your resume seeking work?</p>
<p>Perhaps you posted a resume on line shortly before you became disabled. Have you forgotten about it? Did you remember to remove it from the site when you became unable to work? Even if you did, can it still be retrieved from the web?</p>
<p>Much has also been made in the news media about potential employers looking at social media sites such as Facebook and MySpace to see what they can learn. If someone might research you, what might they learn about you at these sites? If you participate in an online chat group, how might your comments be misconstrued? Also, if you are posting all the time, what might that say about your computer skills and your ability to concentrate? Do not assume that the postings are private because it is a disease support group web site. Who knows, your ALJ may actually belong to the support group and be reading about you.</p>
<p>There used to be an ALJ in Indianapolis that would state that he got on the SSA system the day before the hearing and personally ran the earnings records to see what it showed. He would then ask the claimant pointed questions about the latest findings. You need to be prepared to answer the ALJ’s questions about what the internet reveals about you. You may hear the ALJ begin a question with “I see on the web that…..”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://disabilitytse.com/90/social-security-disability-and-computer-usage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical Diagnosis Alone Is Not Enough in Social Security Disability Case</title>
		<link>http://disabilitytse.com/46/medical-diagnosis-alone-is-not-enough-in-social-security-disability-case/</link>
		<comments>http://disabilitytse.com/46/medical-diagnosis-alone-is-not-enough-in-social-security-disability-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Impairment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claimant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Degenerative Disc Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability Claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability Claimants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fibromyalgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Severity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Disability Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Source Statement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilitytse.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently saw an article on the Social Security Disability Lawyer by attorney Gordon Gates about it not being the diagnosis but the severity of the impairment that is important. He states: &#8220;When talking with Social Security disability claimants, I often hear a statement like &#8220;I can&#8217;t work because I have been diagnosed with bipolar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently saw an article on the <a href="http://www.socialsecuritydisabilitylawyer.us/blog/2009/05/its-not-the-diagnosis-its-the-severity.html">Social Security Disability Lawyer</a> by attorney Gordon Gates about  it not being the diagnosis but the severity of the impairment that is important. He states: </p>
<p>    &#8220;When talking with Social Security disability claimants, I often hear a statement like &#8220;I can&#8217;t work because I have been diagnosed with bipolar disorder&#8221; (or degenerative disc disease, or fibromyalgia). The claimant makes the statement like the matter is settled. The reasoning seems to be: since there is a doctor&#8217;s diagnosis of my impairment, my disability claim should be granted.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, that reasoning is not at all correct. It is not the diagnosis of the impairment but the severity of the impairment that matters in a Social Security disability claim. And I explain this to clients every day.</p>
<p>The diagnosis is just the beginning. A good beginning to be sure, since the diagnosis satisfies the medically determinable requirement in a Social Security disability claim. But the important thing is the severity of your impairment. How much does it affect your functionality? How does it affect your ability to work? These are the important questions in a Social Security disability case.</p>
<p>What is missing from almost every denied Social Security disability claim is evidence establishing a claimant&#8217;s functional limitations. A medical diagnosis alone does not establish any functional limitations. And unfortunately, a patient&#8217;s medical records usually have little information regarding functional limitations (medical records are created and maintained for medical providers to track a patient&#8217;s medical care, not to establish disability).</p>
<p>So remember, it&#8217;s not the diagnosis but the severity of the impairment that matters. And a Social Security disability lawyer spends a great deal of time trying to obtain evidence &#8211; often a medical source statement &#8211; that will establish a claimant&#8217;s functional limitations.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am in complete agreement with Mr. Gates observations. I have the same conversations with people all the time. I remind people that they need to tell <a href="http://disabilitytse.com/16/the-whole-truth/">the whole truth</a> about their inability to work. You really do need to know the <a href="http://disabilitytse.com/7/do-you-know-the-rules-of-social-security/">rules of Social Security disability.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://disabilitytse.com/46/medical-diagnosis-alone-is-not-enough-in-social-security-disability-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do You Know the Rules of Social Security?</title>
		<link>http://disabilitytse.com/7/do-you-know-the-rules-of-social-security/</link>
		<comments>http://disabilitytse.com/7/do-you-know-the-rules-of-social-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Captain James T Kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Card Game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Card Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claimant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claimants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability Claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability Determination Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Face Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gambler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James T Kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King Queen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Play Game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek Captain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilitytse.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In January of 1968, in the second season of Star Trek, Captain James T. Kirk invites the mobster Jojo Krako to play a card game of Fizzbin. Krako, who plays a lot of card games, accepts even though he does not know the rules. Kirk deals the cards. Kirk and Spock then begin to turn [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/library/episodes/TOS/detail/68758.html"></a><a href="http://disabilitytse.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/fizzbin.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9" title="fizzbin" src="http://disabilitytse.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/fizzbin-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
<p>In January of 1968, in the second season of Star Trek, Captain James T. Kirk invites the mobster Jojo Krako to play a card game of Fizzbin. Krako, who plays a lot of card games, accepts even though he does not know the rules. Kirk deals the cards. Kirk and Spock then begin to turn over the cards of Krako&#8217;s hand. His hand reveals face cards (King, Queen, Jack). Krako is excited as he says he has a good hand. Kirk then tells him that in Fizzbin a King is bad, a Queen is bad, and a Jack is bad. In fact, Kirk says, Kirk&#8217;s hand of  low cards is the winner and Krako has lost. When I saw the program, it was obvious to me that Kirk was making up the rules as he went. There was no way that Krako could win because he did not know the rules. If you want to purchase the DVD so you can see the whole episode, click here <a href="http://startrek.com/startrek/view/library/episodes/TOS/detail/68758.html" target="_blank">Star Trek DVD</a></p>
<p>Many claimants go about their Social Security Disability claim in the same manner. They do not know the rules and believe anything that anyone at Social Security says. If someone from the Disability Determination Bureau says that you have to go to an examination by one of their doctors, how do you know any different?</p>
<p>Other times a claimant is like Jojo Krako because something in the process is so familiar that they do not question it&#8211;they do  not realize that under the rules of this game, a King is not a good thing to have. A good attorney who has had years of experience dealing with Social Security will be able to tell you the rules and warn you ahead of time about them so that you can make the best presentation of your case.</p>
<p>Do you know all the rules of Social Security Disability? How big of a gambler are you with your case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://disabilitytse.com/7/do-you-know-the-rules-of-social-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
